Matter of Castillo (Greaves)

2024 NY Slip Op 51317(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, Kings County
DecidedSeptember 24, 2024
DocketIndex No. 519019/2024
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 51317(U) (Matter of Castillo (Greaves)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, Kings County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Castillo (Greaves), 2024 NY Slip Op 51317(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

Matter of Castillo (Greaves) (2024 NY Slip Op 51317(U)) [*1]
Matter of Castillo (Greaves)
2024 NY Slip Op 51317(U)
Decided on September 24, 2024
Supreme Court, Kings County
Maslow, J.
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on September 24, 2024
Supreme Court, Kings County


In the Matter of the Application of Monica Castillo, Petitioner,
for an Order pursuant to of the Civil Practice Law and Rules of the State of New York § 3102(c) and all other applicable laws, statutes, and regulations, Permitting Preservation and Production of Discovery, from:
Desmond Greaves a/k/a Desmond H. Greaves II, DG Custom Built Homes & Remodeling, LLC, and CNC Coatings Corp. d/b/a Airseal Insulations Inc., Respondents.




Index No. 519019/2024

Edelman & Edelman, P.C., New York City (Cameron Thompson of counsel), for Petitioner.
Aaron D. Maslow, J.

The following numbered papers were used on this motion: NYSCEF Document Numbers 1-16.

Upon the foregoing papers, all submitted by Petitioner, there being no written opposition, and having heard oral argument from counsel for Petitioner in support of the petition, and due deliberation having been had, the within petition is determined as follows.

BACKGROUND

Petitioner alleges that on June 24, 2024, she was performing home insulation work at the first level of a partially constructed structure at 134 Daly Road, East Northport, New York 11731 (the "Premises") when she fell approximately 12 feet through an unfinished and unprotected opening in the flooring and into the basement below. Petitioner alleges that she was removed via ambulance from the Premises to a hospital, where she was diagnosed with a fractured T12 vertebra, among other injuries.

Petitioner alleges that the Premises were owned by DESMOND GREAVES a/k/a DESMOND H. GREAVES II ("GREAVES"), who is the owner of DG CUSTOM BUILT HOMES & REMODELING ("DG"). Petitioner alleges that when she was injured she was assisting in the performance of insulation work at the premises on behalf of CNC COATINGS [*2]CORP. d/b/a AIRSEAL INSULATIONS INC. ("CNC").

Petitioner alleges that at the time of the incident she was engaged in protected activities under the New York State Labor Law and as such she was entitled to, but was not afforded, the protections of the New York State Labor Law. Petitioner alleges that prospective defendants breached their statutory duties owed to her and this breach caused her to fall through the flooring while she was performing her insulation work, which resulted in significant personal injuries and damages.

Petitioner alleges that the Premises were not used as a residence at the time of the incident and that GREAVES' control of the Premises may have exceeded that of the ordinary homeowner, including coordinating with subcontractors. Petitioner alleges these facts may obviate prospective defenses to liability for her injuries pursuant to the Labor Law by GREAVES as a one- or two-family homeowner.



PETITIONER'S APPLICATION PURSUANT TO CPLR 3102 (c)

Before the Court is Petitioner's application for an Order pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), compelling the Respondents to identify the entities who directed, supervised, managed, or otherwise controlled construction, renovation, insulation work, and/or other work performed at the Premises on or about June 24, 2024, including the identity of the contractors, owners, and their agents who were present at the Premises on or about June 24, 2024 (the "Materials Sought for Production").

Petitioner seeks the Materials Sought for Production to allow her to frame a complaint and to obtain the identities of prospective defendants in her potential action for personal injuries and damages pursuant to New York State Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6).

The Petitioner's application also includes a request for an Order compelling the Respondents to preserve various items of information referred to as the "Materials Requested to Be Preserved," which include contact information and roles of all relevant entities, permits and related documents, contracts and agreements, safety protocols and incident reports, employment records, insurance details, surveillance footage, and photographs.


DISCUSSION

Pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), "Before an action is commenced, disclosure to aid in bringing an action, to preserve information or to aid in arbitration, may be obtained, but only by court order. The court may appoint a referee to take testimony." Such disclosure may be sought within the confines of a special proceeding (see Bumpus v New York City Tr. Auth., 66 AD3d 26 [2d Dept 2009]). Pre-action disclosure may be appropriate to preserve evidence (see Holzman v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 271 AD2d 346 [1st Dept 2000]).

Disclosure to aid in bringing an action authorizes discovery to allow a plaintiff to frame a complaint and to obtain the identities of prospective defendants (see Westbrook v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 226 AD3d 692, 693 [2d Dept 2024]; Matter of Diaz v Metropolitan Tr. Auth., 190 AD3d 734 [2d Dept 2021]). Where the facts alleged state a cause of action, the protection of a party's affairs is no longer the primary consideration and an examination to determine the identities of the parties and what form or forms the action should take is appropriate (see Westbrook, 226 AD3d at 693, citing Matter of Houlihan-Parnes, Realtors v Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., 58 AD2d 629, 630 [2d Dept. 1977]).

New York State Labor Law § 240 (1) imposes upon owners, contractors, and their agents a nondelegable duty to provide workers proper protection from elevated-related hazards (see Fuentes v 257 Toppings Path, LLC, 225 AD3d 746, 748 [2d Dept. 2024]). The purpose of the [*3]statute is to protect workers from pronounced risks arising from construction site elevation differentials (see id.). Such an elevation risk may exist in the form of an uncovered, unguarded opening in a floor through which an insulation work falls, as was the case in Fuentes where the plaintiff was performing insulation work when he fell through an opening in an attic space and was injured. The opening was intended to be covered by a panel that would provide access to the attic upon completion of construction, but it was not covered.

Under Fuentes, the failure to provide proper protection to an insulation worker from an uncovered and unguarded opening may be considered a proximate cause of a plaintiff's injuries and liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) may therefore be proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Castillo (Greaves)
2024 NY Slip Op 51317(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 51317(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-castillo-greaves-nysupctkings-2024.