Matter of Branic Intl. Realty Corp. v. Department of Hous., Preserv. & Dev. of the City of N.Y.

2021 NY Slip Op 01715
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 23, 2021
DocketIndex No. 155541/19 Appeal No. 13408 Case No. 2020-03261
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 01715 (Matter of Branic Intl. Realty Corp. v. Department of Hous., Preserv. & Dev. of the City of N.Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Branic Intl. Realty Corp. v. Department of Hous., Preserv. & Dev. of the City of N.Y., 2021 NY Slip Op 01715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Branic Intl. Realty Corp. v Department of Hous., Preserv. & Dev. of the City of N.Y. (2021 NY Slip Op 01715)
Matter of Branic Intl. Realty Corp. v Department of Hous., Preserv. & Dev. of the City of N.Y.
2021 NY Slip Op 01715
Decided on March 23, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 23, 2021
Before: Webber, J.P., Oing, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.

Index No. 155541/19 Appeal No. 13408 Case No. 2020-03261

[*1]In the Matter of Branic International Realty Corp., Lienee-Appellant,

v

Department of Housing, Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Lienor-Respondent.


Rose & Rose, New York (David P. Haberman of counsel), for appellant.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York (Nwamaka Ejebe of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered June 15, 2020, which denied petitioner's motion for an order discharging the notice of lien filed by respondent, granted respondent's cross motion to dismiss the petition, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The petition was properly dismissed. The record shows that the notice of lien was served "by . . . certified mail addressed to [petitioner's] last known place of business," and that respondent properly filed proof of service with the County Clerk within 35 days (Lien Law § 11[d][iii]; see Matter of Informart New York LLC v Hugh O'Kane Elec. Co.,

2003 NY Slip Op 30231[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2003]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 23, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Branic Intl. Realty Corp. v. Department of Hous., Preserv. & Dev. of the City of N.Y.
2021 NY Slip Op 01715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 01715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-branic-intl-realty-corp-v-department-of-hous-preserv-dev-nyappdiv-2021.