Matter of Boyd v. Annucci

142 A.D.3d 1214, 37 N.Y.S.3d 458
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 2016·No. 522144·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to *1215 which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of James v Prack, 137 AD3d 1390, 1391 [2016]; Matter of Roye v Annucci, 137 AD3d 1392, 1393 [2016]).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Rose, Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Boyd v. Annucci, 142 A.D.3d 1214, 37 N.Y.S.3d 458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 1214 (Matter of Boyd v. Annucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waters v. Purdy
149 A.D.3d 1444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Hines v. Venettozzi
148 A.D.3d 1444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Brown v. Venettozzi
148 A.D.3d 1446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Wallace v. Annucci
146 A.D.3d 1263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)