Brown v. Venettozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. Venettozzi

148 A.D.3d 1446, 48 N.Y.S.3d 650

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 23, 2017·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Boyd v Annucci, 142 AD3d 1214, 1214-1215 [2016]; Matter of Flood v Prack, 141 AD3d 1070, 1070-1071 [2016]).

Garry, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Boyd v Annucci, 142 AD3d 1214, 1214-1215 [2016]; Matter of Flood v Prack, 141 AD3d 1070, 1070-1071 [2016]).

Garry, J.P., Lynch, Rose, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Brown v. Venettozzi, 148 A.D.3d 1446, 48 N.Y.S.3d 650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

148 A.D.3d 1446 (Brown v. Venettozzi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related