Matter of Bogold v. Bogold Brothers, Inc.

157 N.E. 863, 245 N.Y. 574, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 738
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1927·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Appellate Division has remitted the claim to the State Industrial Board merely to reinstate the award to respondent in accordance with the opinions of the Appellate Division. No further hearing is contemplated. Appellant on the argument stipulates for such award in case of affirmance. The order may be regarded as a final order or an order for anew trial with stipulation for judgment absolute and subject to review in this court.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Bogold v. Bogold Brothers, Inc., 157 N.E. 863, 245 N.Y. 574, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 738 (N.Y. 1927).

157 N.E. 863 (Matter of Bogold v. Bogold Brothers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Dodson v. S. A. Healey Co.
275 A.D.2d 130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Claim of Manning v. Stroh & Wilson, Inc.
247 A.D. 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Claim of Shanley v. Slattery Contracting Co.
232 A.D. 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Claim of Graham v. E. W. Bliss Co.
226 A.D. 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
Claim of Sienko v. Bopp & Morgenstern
222 A.D. 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Claim of Millon v. Ideal Wet Wash Laundry Co.
222 A.D. 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)