Claim of Shanley v. Slattery Contracting Co.
232 A.D. 860
Opinion
Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the claimant against the employer and the insurance carrier, on the ground that a stepchild, actually dependent on a stepfather, is a dependent, even though the father is still living but divorced from the mother of the child. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 2, subd. 11; Yeople v. Bose Co., 182 App. Div. 438; affd., 223 N. Y. 687; Matter of Bogold v. Bogold Bros., 218 App. Div. 676; affd., 245 N. Y. 574.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Shanley v. Slattery Contracting Co., 232 A.D. 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
232 A.D. 860 (Claim of Shanley v. Slattery Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Yeople v. . John B. Rose Company
119 N.E. 1087 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Matter of Bogold v. Bogold Brothers, Inc.
157 N.E. 863 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Claim of Yeople v. John B. Rose Co.
182 A.D. 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Claim of Bogold v. Bogold Bros.
218 A.D. 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)