MATTER OF BEATTY v. Owens

443 N.E.2d 475, 57 N.Y.2d 952, 457 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3820
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 1982·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Never before have we imposed the sanction of depriving a primary candidate of an election victory absent a showing of that candidate’s responsibility for the fraud or misconduct, nor does the record in this case warrant the imposition of such a sanction. Petitioner failed to present evidence sufficient to establish irregularities or misconduct under either the rule of Matter of De Martini v Power (27 NY2d 149) and Matter of Ippolito v Power (22 NY2d 594) or Matter of Lowenstein v Larkin (40 AD2d 604, affd 31 NY2d 654). Indeed, the Appellate Division acknowl[954] edged that the number of irregularities were not sufficient to change the result of the election or justify ordering a new election.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF BEATTY v. Owens, 443 N.E.2d 475, 57 N.Y.2d 952, 457 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3820 (N.Y. 1982).

443 N.E.2d 475 (MATTER OF BEATTY v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swanson v. Sunderland
176 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Schreiber v. Gorman
167 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Conroy v. Levine
100 A.D.2d 918 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
MATTER OF BEATTY v. Owens
443 N.E.2d 475 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)