Matter of Baker v. Baker

122 A.D.3d 924, 997 N.Y.S.2d 682
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 26, 2014
Docket2013-11129
StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.3d 924 (Matter of Baker v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Baker v. Baker, 122 A.D.3d 924, 997 N.Y.S.2d 682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Debra J. Kiedaisch, J.), dated November 25, 2013. The order denied Christopher Baker’s motion to vacate a prior order of filiation of that court and a prior order of support of that court, and granted Carolann Baker’s cross motion for an award of an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that the order dated November 25, 2013, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant moved to vacate an order of filiation and a related order of support on the ground that his admission to paternity of the subject child was invalid. The Family Court properly denied the motion. Contrary to his contention, the appellant was properly advised of his statutory rights, and nothing in the record indicates that his admission to paternity of the subject child was anything other than knowing and voluntary (see Matter of Loma D. v Colin Anderson A., 21 AD3d 1030 [2005]; Matter of Maldonado v Reyes, 2 AD3d 526 [2003]; Matter of Sidoti v Velez, 278 AD2d 498 [2000]; Matter of McLeod v Emanuel, 268 AD2d 434 [2000]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Mastro, J.E, Roman, Miller and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maldonado v. Reyes
2 A.D.3d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Lorna D. v. Anderson A.
21 A.D.3d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
McLeod v. Emanuel
268 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Sidoti v. Velez
278 A.D.2d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.D.3d 924, 997 N.Y.S.2d 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-baker-v-baker-nyappdiv-2014.