Maldonado v. Reyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Maldonado v. Reyes

2 A.D.3d 527, 767 N.Y.S.2d 908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 527 (Maldonado v. Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maldonado v. Reyes, 2 A.D.3d 527, 767 N.Y.S.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the putative father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated August 1, 2002, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Mayeri, H.E.), dated September 7, 2001.

Ordered that the order dated August 1, 2002, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Barnes v Scott, 283 AD2d 427 [2001]). S. Miller, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the putative father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated August 1, 2002, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Mayeri, H.E.), dated September 7, 2001.

Ordered that the order dated August 1, 2002, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Barnes v Scott, 283 AD2d 427 [2001]). S. Miller, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 527, 767 N.Y.S.2d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maldonado-v-reyes-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack