Barnes v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Barnes v. Scott

283 A.D.2d 427, 723 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4729

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 A.D.2d 427 (Barnes v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnes v. Scott, 283 A.D.2d 427, 723 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, Ishmael Scott, Jr., appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Se-gal, J.), dated April 22, 1998, which denied his motion to vacate an order of filiation, dated March 5, 1996, entered upon his default in appearing for a blood test.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Rainey v Jaudon, 82 AD2d 739, 740). Bracken, P. J., Florio, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, Ishmael Scott, Jr., appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Se-gal, J.), dated April 22, 1998, which denied his motion to vacate an order of filiation, dated March 5, 1996, entered upon his default in appearing for a blood test.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Rainey v Jaudon, 82 AD2d 739, 740). Bracken, P. J., Florio, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 427, 723 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-scott-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack