Matter of Baker

2025 NY Slip Op 31360(U)

• Court: Surrogate's Court, New York County
• Decided: April 16, 2025
• Docket: File No. 2016-4312/A
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Matter of Baker 2025 NY Slip Op 31360(U) April 16, 2025 Surrogate's Court, New York County Docket Number: File No. 2016-4312/A Judge: Hilary Gingold Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. SURROGATE'S COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X Accounting of the Public Administrator of the County of New York as Administrator of the Estate of DECISION

HENRY BAKER. a/k/a File No. 2016-4312/ A 1-IENRY L. BAKER, a/k/a HENRY JUDD BAKER,

Deceased. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X

GING OLD. S.

Incident to this final accounting in the Estate of Henry Baker. the Public Administrator

seeks to dismiss without prejudice the kinship objections raised by alleged distributees and to

deposit the net estate with the Commissioner of Finance of the City of New York. Decedent died

on August 28, 2016, leaving a gross estate valued at approximately $178,096.46.

The Public Administrator first filed her petition on June 4. 2020. Over the course of the

next three years, the following individuals filed objections: I) Joan Thomas McFarland. alleged

niece, 2) Amanda Thomas, alleged grandniece. 3) Gabrielle Thomas. alleged grandniece, 4)

Charlie Baker III, alleged nephew, 5) Maria E. Baker. fiduciary of alleged post-deceased sibling,

6) Elijah Thomas, Jr., alleged nephew. 7) John Thomas. alleged nephew. 8) Janice M. McBride.

alleged niece, and 9) Ethel Alcan Baker. alleged sibling (collectively, Objectants).

The court tried to schedule an initial kinship hearing in this matter numerous times. to no

avail. Eventually, Objectants' counsel lost communication \vith Objectants and the court relieved

her of representation on such grounds in May of 2024. In response to an Order sent by the court

to the Objeetants as prose litigants rescheduling the hearing. the court was informed that in July

of 2024 Ethel A lean Baker had post-deceased. Howe\·er, no fiduciary was appointed for her estate

in the time allotted by the court, and she was not substituted as a party. Consequently, her

objections were dismissed by court Order on March 3. 2025. The court then scheduled a kinship

[* 1] hearing, which constituted its sixth attempt at doing so, for April 2, 2025 upon proper notice to the

remaining Objectants.

A kinship hearing was held on April 2, 2025. J\11 rcma111111g Objectants defaulted in

appearance. The Public Administrator then moved to dismiss the remaining objections based upon

Objectants' failure to be ready to establish kinship at a hearing and place the net estate in deposit.

The guardian ad !item appointed to represent the interests of decedent's unknown distributees did

not oppose this motion and has also recommended that the net estate assets be deposited pending

a kinship determination.

It is well established that objectants have the burden of proving kinship (Matter qf Gavin,

41 Misc 3d 232 [Sur Ct, Erie County 2013]). Specifically, they must prove by a preponderance of

the evidence 1) their relationship to the decedent, 2) the absence of any person with a closer degree

of relationship, and 3) the maximum number of persons having the same degree of relationship to

the decedent (Maffer of Whelan, 93 AD2d 891 [2d Dept 19831). Particularly when alleging that a

distributee's relationship to a decedent is derived through another person who is deceased, a family

tree diagram should be annexed and supported by evidence consisting of testimony, preferably

from a disinterested person such as a professional genealogist. and corroborating documentation

(Uniform Rules for Surrogate's Cou1i [22 NYCRR 207.l6(b)]; see also Maffer of.Jordan, 52

AD3d 328 [1st Dept 2008]). When it has been at least three years since a decedent's death the

court may determine that no distributee or prior class exists other than those before the court, but

only if satisfied that an objectant has diligently and exhaustively searched for other potential

distributees or classes (SCP A 2225 [bl).

Here, Objectants did not prepare a family tree diagram. Neither did they submit, much less

enter into evidence, any supporting records or papers. They presented no searches for potential

distributees for the purpose of relying on any presumption afforded by SCPA 2225 (b ). Objectants

[* 2] did not propose any witnesses and defaulted in appearance at the hearing. Hence. no testimony

was taken. Under these circumstances. the court simply must find that Objectants have failed to

establish kinship.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the objections of Joan Thomas McFarland. Amanda Thomas. Gabrielle

Thomas, Charlie Baker III, Maria E. Baker, Elijah Thomas, Jr., John Thomas, and Janice M.

McBride are hereby dismissed, without prejudice, and it is further

ORDERED that the net estate be deposited with the Commissioner of Finance of the City

of New York for the benefit of unknown distributees. and it is further

ORDERED that the Public Administrator shall supplement her account by affidavit and.

as so supplemented. the account is settled, and it is further

ORDERED that Public Administrator shall settle decree providing for compensation of the

guardian ad !item.

The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this decision. which constitutes the order of

the court, to all parties in this proceeding by mail at the addresses below .

. ~ Dated: Apnl ~ - 2025

To:

Joan Thomas Mcfarland John Thomas 302 Kendallwood Road 1154 LA-605 West Monroe, LA 712 92 Newellton, LA 71357

Charlie Baker III Elijah Thomas. Jr. 823 West 126th Street 1154 LJ\-605 Los Angeles, CA 90044 Newellton. LJ\ 71357

[* 3] Amanda Thomas Janice M. McBride 4230 Ridgeway Road 12527 Waxwing Park Shreveport, LA 711 07 Houston. TX 77396

Gabrielle Thomas Staci A. Graber, Esq. 4230 Ridgeway Road The Law Of1ice of Staci A. Graber. P.C. Shreveport, LA 71107 Attorney for the NY County Public Administrator .'.ifila be L{i__s g I:_1_\\_QS:', ~-QlJJ Maria E. Baker 1102 West 13yct Street Judith A. Woods. Esq .. Assistant Attorney General Gardina, CA 9024 7 New York State Office of the Attorney General Jt1di1h. \\ ( ids .u_;1gny,g<1, 11

Jerry M. Judin, Esq. Guardian ad litem j::i.yjayJ;t\YLf(\to].c()tn

[* 4]