Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Martinez]

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 19, 2015
DocketD-17-15
StatusPublished

This text of Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Martinez] (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Martinez]) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Martinez], (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: February 19, 2015 D-17-15

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STANDARDS, ON MOTION Petitioner;

JORGE O. MARTINEZ, Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 2009066)

Calendar Date: February 9, 2015

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Jorge O. Martinez, Fairfield, Connecticut, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1985, was suspended by this Court's order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of -2- D-17-15

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
65 A.D.3d 1447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Martinez], Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law--nyappdiv-2015.