Matos v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital

60 A.D.2d 909, 401 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9962
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 A.D.2d 909 (Matos v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matos v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital, 60 A.D.2d 909, 401 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death, the individual defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 21, 1977, which denied their motion, inter alia, to require plaintiff to furnish duly executed authorizations to obtain copies of all records relating to the decedent in the possession of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Order modified by deleting therefrom the provision denying the motion in its entirety and substituting therefor provisions that the branch of the motion which seeks dismissal of the complaint is denied and that the branch of the motion which seeks the authorization to obtain copies of records is granted to the extent that plaintiff is directed to furnish appellants’ attorneys with a duly executed authorization permitting them to inspect and obtain a copy of the life insurance application made by plaintiff’s intestate to the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., and all medical records in the possession of that said company pertaining to that application. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff’s time to furnish the authorization is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. In our opinion, under the circumstances of this case, the branch of appellants’ motion which sought to compel the furnishing of authorizations should have been granted, as provided herein (see Greuling v Breakey, 56 AD2d 540; Myers v Schneider, 59 AD2d 736). Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scalone v. Phelps Memorial Hospital Center
184 A.D.2d 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Calhoun v. Pickett
77 A.D.2d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.D.2d 909, 401 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matos-v-st-johns-episcopal-hospital-nyappdiv-1978.