Home/Supreme Court/Matles v. United States

Matles v. United States

356 U.S. 256, 78 S. Ct. 712, 2 L. Ed. 2d 741, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1264
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 7, 1958
Docket378
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 356 U.S. 256 (Matles v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matles v. United States, 356 U.S. 256, 78 S. Ct. 712, 2 L. Ed. 2d 741, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1264 (1958).

Opinion

*257 Per Curiam.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. In No. 378 the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the order holding the petitioner in contempt and to dismiss the complaint. In Nos. 450 and 494 the judgments of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit are reversed and the cases are remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaints. An affidavit showing good cause is a prerequisite to the initiation of denaturalization proceedings. The affidavit must be filed with the complaint when the proceedings are instituted. United States v. Zueca, 351 U. S. 91, 99-100.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rahman
E.D. Michigan, 2020
Firefighters' Ret. Sys. v. EisnerAmper, L.L.P.
898 F.3d 553 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
The Washington Post Company v. United States Department of State, the Washington Post Company v. United States Department of State
647 F.2d 197 (D.C. Circuit, 1981)
SOCIALIST WKRS. PARTY v. Attorney General of US
458 F. Supp. 895 (S.D. New York, 1978)
United States v. Walus
453 F. Supp. 699 (N.D. Illinois, 1978)
Herbert v. Lando
73 F.R.D. 387 (S.D. New York, 1977)
Rinderknecht v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System
520 P.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1974)
United States v. Ryan
360 F. Supp. 265 (E.D. New York, 1973)
Suarez v. Commissioner
58 T.C. 792 (U.S. Tax Court, 1972)
United States v. Filippo Sacco AKA John Rosselli
428 F.2d 264 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Lynam v. Livingston
257 F. Supp. 520 (D. Delaware, 1966)
United States v. Bimba
233 F. Supp. 966 (E.D. New York, 1964)
Matles v. Commissioner
1964 T.C. Memo. 248 (U.S. Tax Court, 1964)
Costello v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
376 U.S. 120 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Sam Title v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
322 F.2d 21 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
Costello v. United States
365 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1961)
United States v. Lucchese
365 U.S. 290 (Supreme Court, 1961)
United States v. Frank Costello
275 F.2d 355 (Second Circuit, 1960)
United States v. Galato
171 F. Supp. 169 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1959)
United States v. Costello
171 F. Supp. 10 (S.D. New York, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 U.S. 256, 78 S. Ct. 712, 2 L. Ed. 2d 741, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matles-v-united-states-scotus-1958.