Mathos v. School Board of Miami-Dade County
This text of 861 So. 2d 520 (Mathos v. School Board of Miami-Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the appellants had no cognizable, substantial rights in the particular positions in which they were employed by the School Board, the Board properly denied their section 120.57, Florida Statutes (2001), request for hearing challenging their reassignments to other executive positions. See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); City of Lauderhill v. Rhames, 864 So.2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA Case no. 4D02-101, opinion filed, October 22, 2003); Muncy v. City of Dallas, 335 F.3d 394 (5th Cir.2003).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 So. 2d 520, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19200, 2003 WL 22956441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathos-v-school-board-of-miami-dade-county-fladistctapp-2003.