Mathis v. State
110 S.E. 342, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 304
Opinion
A conviction of having possession of intoxicating liquor was not authorized by the evidence, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. State, 110 S.E. 342, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
110 S.E. 342 (Mathis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dukes v. State
81 S.E.2d 864 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Jones v. State
16 S.E.2d 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Davis v. State
16 S.E.2d 443 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Lane v. State
134 S.E. 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)