Mathis v. State

110 S.E. 342, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 304
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 17, 1922
Docket13012
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 110 S.E. 342 (Mathis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathis v. State, 110 S.E. 342, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

A conviction of having possession of intoxicating liquor was not authorized by the evidence, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Hugh E. Combs, F. H. Colley, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dukes v. State
81 S.E.2d 864 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Jones v. State
16 S.E.2d 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Davis v. State
16 S.E.2d 443 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Lane v. State
134 S.E. 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 342, 28 Ga. App. 65, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathis-v-state-gactapp-1922.