Mathis v. Social Security Administration

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION HUNTER MATHIS PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:20-cv-01490-BRW-ERE KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER of the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT ORDER I have reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin. No objections have been filed. After careful

consideration of the Recommendation and a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Recommended Disposition in its entirety. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C.

§ 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). IT IS SO ORDERED this _1_8_t_h_ day of _F_e_b_r_u_ar_y___, 2022.

_____B_I_L_L_Y__ R__O_Y_ _W__I_L_S_O_N_________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

HUNTER MATHIS PLAINTIFF

V. NO. 4:20-cv-01490-BRW-ERE

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER of the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT

ORDER

I have reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin and the filed objections. After careful consideration of the Recommendation and a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Recommended Disposition in its entirety. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Accordingly, this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of __________, 2022.

_______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER of the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT

Consistent with the Order entered today, the Commissioner’s decision is reversed and this case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). IT IS SO ORDERED this _____ day of __________, 2021.

_______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE