Mathis v. Baxter
136 Mo. App. 16, 1909 Mo. App. LEXIS 3
Opinion
This case is here on a short transcript. The printed abstract of the record neither contains an affidavit for an appeal nor alludes to one. It says the time for filing bill of exceptions was extended, but not that this was done before the time originally given had expired. With the record in this State wTe are compelled by a point-blank decision of the Supreme Court to dismiss the appeal. [Shemwell v. McKinney, 214 Mo. 692, 114 S. W. 1038.] It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathis v. Baxter, 136 Mo. App. 16, 1909 Mo. App. LEXIS 3 (Mo. Ct. App. 1909).
136 Mo. App. 16 (Mathis v. Baxter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ham v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad
130 S.W. 407 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)