Mathias v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Mathias v. State

108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 20, 1926

Docket8 Div. 387.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 So. 925 (Mathias v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mathias v. State, 108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There is no bill of exceptions, and the only question presented by the record is the right of the clerk of the circuit court to issue the warrant of arrest returnable to the circuit court. The action of the lower court in holding this to be authorized by local statute is affirmed, on authority of Roseberry v. State, 20 Ala. App. 450, 103 So. 898; Reese v. State, 16 Ala. App. 430, 78 So. 460; Daniel v. State, 20 Ala. App. 677, 104 So. 920. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

There is no bill of exceptions, and the only question presented by the record is the right of the clerk of the circuit court to issue the warrant of arrest returnable to the circuit court. The action of the lower court in holding this to be authorized by local statute is affirmed, on authority of Roseberry v. State, 20 Ala. App. 450, 103 So. 898; Reese v. State, 16 Ala. App. 430, 78 So. 460; Daniel v. State, 20 Ala. App. 677, 104 So. 920. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathias-v-state-alactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack