Mathias v. State
108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685
Opinion
There is no bill of exceptions, and the only question presented by the record is the right of the clerk of the circuit court to issue the warrant of arrest returnable to the circuit court. The action of the lower court in holding this to be authorized by local statute is affirmed, on authority of Roseberry v. State, 20 Ala. App. 450, 103 So. 898; Reese v. State, 16 Ala. App. 430, 78 So. 460; Daniel v. State, 20 Ala. App. 677, 104 So. 920. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathias v. State, 108 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
108 So. 925 (Mathias v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collins v. State
118 So. 265 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)