Daniel v. State
104 So. 920, 20 Ala. App. 677
This text of 104 So. 920 (Daniel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Daniel v. State, 104 So. 920, 20 Ala. App. 677 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
Affirmed, on authority of Roseberry v. State (Ala. App.) 103 So. 898; 2 Ex parte Roseberry (Ala. App.) 103 So. 901 ; 3 Reese v. State, 16 Ala. App. 430, 78 So. 460.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Collins v. State
118 So. 265 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Mathias v. State
108 So. 925 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
104 So. 920, 20 Ala. App. 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daniel-v-state-alactapp-1925.