Mathewson v. Boyle
This text of 16 P. 434 (Mathewson v. Boyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
This cause was ordered to be submitted upon briefs. The time within which appellant was allowed to submit his brief expired fifty days since. No brief has been filed in his behalf, nor request made for further time. Under these circumstances, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, by reason of the failure of appellant to prosecute his appeal. (Finlayson v. Montgomery, 14 Nev. 397; Goodhue v. Shedd, 17 Nev. 140.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 P. 434, 20 Nev. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathewson-v-boyle-nev-1887.