Mathewson v. Boyle
16 P. 434, 20 Nev. 88
Opinion
By the Court,
This cause was ordered to be submitted upon briefs. The time within which appellant was allowed to submit his brief expired fifty days since. No brief has been filed in his behalf, nor request made for further time. Under these circumstances, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, by reason of the failure of appellant to prosecute his appeal. (Finlayson v. Montgomery, 14 Nev. 397; Goodhue v. Shedd, 17 Nev. 140.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mathewson v. Boyle, 16 P. 434, 20 Nev. 88 (Neb. 1887).
16 P. 434 (Mathewson v. Boyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gardner v. Pacific Power Co.
163 P. 731 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1917)
Arnold v. Florence Goldfield Mining Co.
36 Nev. 147 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1913)
Potosi Zinc Co. v. Mahoney
34 Nev. 295 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1912)
Linville v. Clark
30 Nev. 113 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1908)