Goodhue v. Shedd

Nevada Supreme Court

Goodhue v. Shedd

17 Nev. 140

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1882

DocketNo. 1111

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 17 Nev. 140 (Goodhue v. Shedd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goodhue v. Shedd, 17 Nev. 140 (Neb. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

[141]*141By the Court,

Hawley, J.:

At the January term, A. I). 1882, this cause was submitted, per stipulation, without oral argument, with leave to appellant to file a brief within twenty days.

On the twenty-fifth of February, 1882, another stipulation was filed, allowing appellant “ten days’ further time to file .and serve its brief.”

That time has long since expired. No extension of time has been asked for, and no brief has been filed. ,

Appellant having failed to prosecute its appeal, tbe judgment of tbe district court, upon the authority of Finlayson v. Montgomery, 14 Nev. 397, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[141]*141By the Court,

Hawley, J.:

At the January term, A. I). 1882, this cause was submitted, per stipulation, without oral argument, with leave to appellant to file a brief within twenty days.

On the twenty-fifth of February, 1882, another stipulation was filed, allowing appellant “ten days’ further time to file .and serve its brief.”

That time has long since expired. No extension of time has been asked for, and no brief has been filed. ,

Appellant having failed to prosecute its appeal, tbe judgment of tbe district court, upon the authority of Finlayson v. Montgomery, 14 Nev. 397, is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Nev. 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goodhue-v-shedd-nev-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack