Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Matfield v. State

Matfield v. State

41 So. 3d 397, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11475, 2010 WL 3001438
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 2010
DocketNo. 1D09-3006
StatusPublished

This text of 41 So. 3d 397 (Matfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matfield v. State, 41 So. 3d 397, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11475, 2010 WL 3001438 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Nash v. State, 766 So.2d 310, 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (affirming conviction for burglary of a vehicle with battery based on reaching into the victim’s vehicle and “intentionally touching] the victim’s closely held purse against her will” because “[b]attery is the actual and intentional touching of another person against that person’s will”); Malczewski v. State, 444 So.2d 1096, 1099 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (holding that the word “person” in section 784.03(l)(a) “means person or anything intimately connected with the person”).

BENTON, VAN NORTWICK, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Malczewski v. State
444 So. 2d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Nash v. State
766 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 So. 3d 397, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11475, 2010 WL 3001438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matfield-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.