Nash v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nash v. State

775 So. 2d 309, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1403, 2000 WL 192177

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2000

DocketNo. 2D98-4344

StatusPublished

This text of 775 So. 2d 309 (Nash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nash v. State, 775 So. 2d 309, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1403, 2000 WL 192177 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no error in the trial court’s denial of Calvin Nash’s motion to suppress and the sentence imposed. We direct the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error on the judgment to reflect that Nash entered a plea of nolo contendere.

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no error in the trial court’s denial of Calvin Nash’s motion to suppress and the sentence imposed. We direct the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error on the judgment to reflect that Nash entered a plea of nolo contendere.

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

775 So. 2d 309, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1403, 2000 WL 192177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nash-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack