Mateo v. Goord

265 A.D.2d 772, 697 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10913
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 28, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 772 (Mateo v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mateo v. Goord, 265 A.D.2d 772, 697 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the disciplinary rules which prohibit inmates from possessing a weapon, unauthorized exchange and possessing contraband. The misbehavior report and testimony received at the hearing, including petitioner’s plea of guilty to unauthorized exchange and his admission to possessing contraband, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Nicholas v Schriver, 259 AD2d 863).

Furthermore, the record belies petitioner’s assertion that he was not provided with either a misbehavior report written in Spanish or a Spanish interpreter during the hearing. Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his vague and conclusory assertions that he was denied due process, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goncalves v. Goord
289 A.D.2d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Wells v. Selsky
282 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Barakat v. Goord
271 A.D.2d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 772, 697 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mateo-v-goord-nyappdiv-1999.