Goncalves v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goncalves v. Goord

288 A.D.2d 793, 733 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11494

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 793 (Goncalves v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goncalves v. Goord, 288 A.D.2d 793, 733 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the proceeding is dismissed [794]*794as moot (see, Matter of Holmes v Selsky, 283 AD2d 754; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the proceeding is dismissed [794]*794as moot (see, Matter of Holmes v Selsky, 283 AD2d 754; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 793, 733 N.Y.S.2d 645, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goncalves-v-goord-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack