Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.

Fourth Circuit

Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.

114 F. App'x 119

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2004·No. Nos. 04-1041, 04-1568·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s orders denying his various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Constr. Co., Nos. CA-02-1671; CA-00-829 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2003; filed Dec. 4 & entered Dec. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s orders denying his various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Constr. Co., Nos. CA-02-1671; CA-00-829 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2003; filed Dec. 4 & entered Dec. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co., 114 F. App'x 119 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

114 F. App'x 119 (Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.