Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.

Fourth Circuit

Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.

40 F. App'x 758

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 8, 2002·No. 02-1189·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion for independent action to vacate and set aside the judgments filed on February 14th and 21st.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co., No. CA-00-829-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be-

fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion for independent action to vacate and set aside the judgments filed on February 14th and 21st.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co., No. CA-00-829-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be-

fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co., 40 F. App'x 758 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

40 F. App'x 758 (Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.