Mastromatteo v. Manna

94 N.E.2d 779, 326 Mass. 794
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 2, 1950
StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.E.2d 779 (Mastromatteo v. Manna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mastromatteo v. Manna, 94 N.E.2d 779, 326 Mass. 794 (Mass. 1950).

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff, a gratuitous guest, was hurt while riding in a truck operated by the defendant. In this action of tort based upon gross [795]*795negligence, the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was granted, and the plaintiff excepted. There was no error. No useful purpose would be served in a recital of the evidence. The pertinent principles have been discussed in numerous decisions, of which we cite a few. McKenna v. Smith, 275 Mass. 149. Richards v. Donohue, 285 Mass. 19. Desroches v. Holland, 285 Mass. 495. Quinlivan v. Taylor, 298 Mass. 138. Pittsley v. David, 298 Mass. 552, 557-559. Romer v. Kaplan, 315 Mass. 736.

D. E. Swartz & Nunziato Fusaro, for the plaintiff. L. E. Stockwell, for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKenna v. Smith
175 N.E. 474 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Richards v. Donohue
285 Mass. 19 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Desroches v. Holland
285 Mass. 495 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Quinlivan v. Taylor
10 N.E.2d 96 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Pittsley v. David
11 N.E.2d 461 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Romer v. Kaplan
54 N.E.2d 673 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 N.E.2d 779, 326 Mass. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mastromatteo-v-manna-mass-1950.