Mastromatteo v. Manna

94 N.E.2d 779, 326 Mass. 794
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 2, 1950·Published

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff, a gratuitous guest, was hurt while riding in a truck operated by the defendant. In this action of tort based upon gross [795]*795negligence, the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was granted, and the plaintiff excepted. There was no error. No useful purpose would be served in a recital of the evidence. The pertinent principles have been discussed in numerous decisions, of which we cite a few. McKenna v. Smith, 275 Mass. 149. Richards v. Donohue, 285 Mass. 19. Desroches v. Holland, 285 Mass. 495. Quinlivan v. Taylor, 298 Mass. 138. Pittsley v. David, 298 Mass. 552, 557-559. Romer v. Kaplan, 315 Mass. 736.

D. E. Swartz & Nunziato Fusaro, for the plaintiff. L. E. Stockwell, for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mastromatteo v. Manna, 94 N.E.2d 779, 326 Mass. 794 (Mass. 1950).

94 N.E.2d 779 (Mastromatteo v. Manna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKenna v. Smith
175 N.E. 474 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Richards v. Donohue
285 Mass. 19 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Desroches v. Holland
285 Mass. 495 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Quinlivan v. Taylor
10 N.E.2d 96 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Pittsley v. David
11 N.E.2d 461 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Romer v. Kaplan
54 N.E.2d 673 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)