Mastromatteo v. Manna
This text of 94 N.E.2d 779 (Mastromatteo v. Manna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff, a gratuitous guest, was hurt while riding in a truck operated by the defendant. In this action of tort based upon gross [795]*795negligence, the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was granted, and the plaintiff excepted. There was no error. No useful purpose would be served in a recital of the evidence. The pertinent principles have been discussed in numerous decisions, of which we cite a few. McKenna v. Smith, 275 Mass. 149. Richards v. Donohue, 285 Mass. 19. Desroches v. Holland, 285 Mass. 495. Quinlivan v. Taylor, 298 Mass. 138. Pittsley v. David, 298 Mass. 552, 557-559. Romer v. Kaplan, 315 Mass. 736.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.E.2d 779, 326 Mass. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mastromatteo-v-manna-mass-1950.