Masters v. State
920 So. 2d 827, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255, 2006 WL 399120
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 22, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-697
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 920 So. 2d 827 (Masters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Masters v. State, 920 So. 2d 827, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255, 2006 WL 399120 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s determination that appellant willfully and substantially violated the terms of his probation, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order setting forth its findings, and the grounds upon which probation was violated.
Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Holitzner v. Holitzner
920 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
920 So. 2d 827, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255, 2006 WL 399120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masters-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.