Masters v. State
920 So. 2d 827, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255, 2006 WL 399120
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 2006·No. No. 4D05-697·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s determination that appellant willfully and substantially violated the terms of his probation, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order setting forth its findings, and the grounds upon which probation was violated.
Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Masters v. State, 920 So. 2d 827, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255, 2006 WL 399120 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
920 So. 2d 827 (Masters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holitzner v. Holitzner
920 So. 2d 827 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)