Masters v. State

918 So. 2d 382, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20429, 2005 WL 3556031
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Masters v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 958 So. 2d 973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2005·No. No. 2D05-3754·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying Robert Masters’ motion for postconviction relief, which was filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Mr. Masters raised an issue concerning his sexual predator status that the trial court did not fully resolve in its order. We cannot confirm that Mr. Masters’ designation as a sexual predator is legal, although nothing in this record suggests that it is unauthorized. If Mr. Masters files a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) alleging that his sexual predator status is not authorized, that motion should be resolved on the merits and should not be denied on the basis of anything presented in this motion. See King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, CANADY and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Masters v. State, 918 So. 2d 382, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 20429, 2005 WL 3556031 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

918 So. 2d 382 (Masters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
911 So. 2d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)