Masters v. Bissett

790 P.2d 32, 101 Or. App. 239, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 335
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Masters v. Bissett. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 Or. App. 163
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 4, 1990·No. A8407-04448; A8407-04139; CA A50520·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Trustee appeals a judgment denying his motion to surcharge the distributive shares of plaintiffs for all of the litigation expenses that he incurred in defending his administration of a testamentary trust of which he and plaintiffs are beneficiaries. This appeal is the fifth one arising out of proceedings that are described in Masters v. Bissett (A41367)(A44881), 101 Or App 163, 790 P2d 16 (1990). Considering all of the issues involved in all of the litigation, including the five appeals, we cannot say, as trustee would have us do, that one side has been any more unreasonable than the other. Equity dictates that each beneficiary bear the cost of this litigation in proportion to the individual’s interest in the trust assets.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Masters v. Bissett, 790 P.2d 32, 101 Or. App. 239, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 335 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

790 P.2d 32 (Masters v. Bissett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Masters v. Bissett
790 P.2d 16 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)