Massman Construction Co. v. Chisholm, Adm'r
This text of 1943 OK 393 (Massman Construction Co. v. Chisholm, Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to No. 30553, Massman' Construction Company v. Donald Chisholm, as Administrator of the Estate of Buck B. Bassham, Deceased, 193 Okla. 473, 145 P. 2d 207, this day decided. The parties are the same. Here in a trial to a jury judgment was rendered on the verdict for $5,377.67 for pain and suffering of the deceased after the injury and prior to death.
The questions in this case include the same questions as were decided adversely to the. plaintiff (defendant in error) in the companion case. There is no essential difference in this evidence and the relative importance thereof.
Our decision in that case governs the disposition of this appeal.
There are certain additional questions herein presented which need not be dis *478 cussed since the insufficiency of the evidence on the point discussed in cause No. 30553, supra, requires that the judgment herein rendered be set aside and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1943 OK 393, 145 P.2d 211, 193 Okla. 477, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massman-construction-co-v-chisholm-admr-okla-1943.