Massey v. Hines, Director General

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Massey v. Hines, Director General

108 S.E. 181, 117 S.C. 1, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 133

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedAugust 1, 1921

Docket10680

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 108 S.E. 181 (Massey v. Hines, Director General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Massey v. Hines, Director General, 108 S.E. 181, 117 S.C. 1, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 133 (S.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinions

The opinion of the'Court was-delivered'by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The sole question in this case is whether or not the Director General of Railroads while in federal control of 'a railroad is liable, in punitive damages for the willful tort of his agents and servants.

1 The question is answered in the negative by the decision of this Court in Rowell v. Hines, 114 S. C. 339; 103 S. E. 545; Ginn v. Hines, 114 S. C. 236; 103 S. E., 548, and by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Missouri, etc., Railroad Co. v. Ault, decided June 1, 1921, 254 U. S.-; 41 Sup. Ct., 593; 65 E. Ed.,-, where it is declared:

"The purpose for which the government permitted itself to be sued Was compensation, not punishment.”

The judgment of this Court is that so much of the judgment of the Circuit Court as is for $8,000 actual damages, be affirmed, and that so much of the judgment as is for $12,000 punitive damages be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI