Massaro v. Mercado

276 A.D.2d 445, 715 N.Y.S.2d 396
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lottie Wilkins, J.), entered July 15, 1999, inter alia, dismissing a CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent’s determination to dismiss, without a hearing, petitioner’s administrative complaint charging the Police Department with disability discrimination in rejecting petitioner as a police officer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent was not required to conduct a hearing simply because it had previously made a probable cause determination in petitioner’s favor. On the basis of the administrative pleadings, there was simply no question that the Police Department’s rejection of petitioner was based on a finding of psychological unsuitability that is not a disability within the meaning of the Human Rights Law (see, Executive Law § 292 [21]), and was not perceived as a disability by the Police Department (cf., Daley v Koch, 892 F2d 212, 215-216). As respondent appropriately noted in its administrative decision, it [446] cannot disturb a hiring decision absent a showing that the decision was influenced by unlawful discrimination. Nor should respondent be required to hold a hearing when it is clear that such a showing cannot be made. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Massaro v. Mercado, 276 A.D.2d 445, 715 N.Y.S.2d 396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 445 (Massaro v. Mercado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holzberg v. Kelly
13 A.D.3d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)