Masonheimer v. State

109 S.W.2d 174
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 20, 1937·No. No. 19174·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The opinion affirming the judgment of conviction was rendered June 25, 1937. The appellant's motion for rehearing was received by the clerk of this court on July 22, 1937, which was 27 days after the rendition of the original opinion. It is a well-settled rule of this court that motions for rehearing must be filed within 15 days after the date of. the original opinion or some good reason given for the failure to do so. See Smith v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 273, 75 S.W.(2d) 449; Rice v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 342, 93 S.W.(2d) 1149; Smith v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 530, 100 S.W.(2d) 359; 4 Tex.Jur. p. 510, § 357. In our examination of the motion for rehearing filed by counsel for appellant, we have failed to find any reason given for the failure to file the motion within the prescribed time.

The motion for rehearing having been filed too late for consideration, it is therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Masonheimer v. State, 109 S.W.2d 174 (Tex. 1937).

109 S.W.2d 174 (Masonheimer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice v. State
93 S.W.2d 1149 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Smith v. State
75 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Smith v. State
100 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)