Masonheimer v. State

107 S.W.2d 379, 133 Tex. Crim. 136, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 456
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 1937·No. No. 19174.·Published

Opinions

KRUEGER, Judge. —

Appellant was convicted of the offense of passing a forged instrument, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without any statement of facts. There is but one bill of exception in the record relating to the court’s action in overruling his plea of former jeopardy. The bill within and of itself fails to contain sufficient facts to support his plea and in the absence of a statement of facts the bill cannot be properly appraised.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has heen examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Masonheimer v. State, 107 S.W.2d 379, 133 Tex. Crim. 136, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 456 (Tex. 1937).

107 S.W.2d 379 (Masonheimer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice v. State
93 S.W.2d 1149 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Smith v. State
75 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Smith v. State
100 S.W.2d 359 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)