Masonheimer v. State
This text of 107 S.W.2d 379 (Masonheimer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of the offense of passing a forged instrument, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.
The record is before us without any statement of facts. There is but one bill of exception in the record relating to the court’s action in overruling his plea of former jeopardy. The bill within and of itself fails to contain sufficient facts to support his plea and in the absence of a statement of facts the bill cannot be properly appraised.
Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has heen examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.W.2d 379, 133 Tex. Crim. 136, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masonheimer-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.