Mason v. Perrotta

41 A.D.2d 916, 343 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4469
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1973·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Determination of respondent Finance Administrator, dated March 14, 1969, unanimously modified, on the law, to direct payment to petitioner of his salary for the period beginning 30 days after his suspension and ending with the date of his dismissal, less outside earnings if any, and otherwise confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Petitioner was suspended without pay on December 6, 1968, and dismissed from the service, following a hearing on charges, on March 14, 1969. We find no error in the proceeding. However, subdivision 3 of section 75 of the Civil Service Law limits the period of suspension without pay to 30 days. Petitioner is consequently entitled to back pay for the period indicated, less any earnings that he might have had during the period (Matter of Amkraut v. Hults, 21 A D 2d 260, affid. 15 N Y [917]*9172d 627; Moquin v. Lowery, 35 A D 2d 661). Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. Perrotta, 41 A.D.2d 916, 343 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

41 A.D.2d 916 (Mason v. Perrotta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. City of Schenectady
161 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Sinicropi v. Bennett
92 A.D.2d 309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Hilf v. New York City Housing Authority
563 F. Supp. 936 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Toro v. Malcolm
44 N.Y. 146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)