Mason v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee
This text of 41 So. 2d 155 (Mason v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to Leona Mason v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn., a corporation, decided this day and reported in Fla.,
The facts are identical in the two cases with the exception that in the present case the policy involved is an accidental death policy insuring the policyholder against "death resulting solely and exclusively from bodily injuries * * * effected by external, violent and accidental means," and the exception clause of the policy provides, "This policy does not cover * * * loss or injury resulting from the use of intoxicating liquors * * *."
We see no valid distinction between the facts of this case and the companion case referred to above. In our view, the judgment in this case, as was the judgment in the companion case, must be reversed because of the failure of the insurance company *Page 156 to show that the death of the insured was within the exception clause of the policy.
It is so ordered.
ADAMS, C.J., and CHAPMAN and HOBSON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 So. 2d 155, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-life-casualty-ins-co-of-tennessee-fla-1949.