Mason v. Beck

Fourth Circuit

Mason v. Beck

55 F. App'x 146

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2003·No. No. 02-6359·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clyde Eugene Mason seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude Mason has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Mason v. Cooper, No. CA-02-11-1-2-2MU (W.D.N.C. filed Jan. 31, 2002; entered Feb. 4, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the [147] appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Clyde Eugene Mason seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude Mason has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Mason v. Cooper, No. CA-02-11-1-2-2MU (W.D.N.C. filed Jan. 31, 2002; entered Feb. 4, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the [147] appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Mason v. Beck, 55 F. App'x 146 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 146 (Mason v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related