Masoero v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Masoero v. State

1914 OK CR 200, 143 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 685, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 95

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 7, 1914·No. No. A-2352.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Prank Masoero was tried and convicted in the county court of Okmulgee county of the offense of failing, neglecting and refusing to work the road in road district No. 4, Henry township, after being duly notified to work the same, and attempted to appeal from the judgment of conviction by filing in this court on October 116th, 1914, a case-made, to which no petition in error was attached at the time it was filed, and none has been filed since. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the pretended appeal on the ground that no petition in error has even been filed in said ease. No answer or response to said motion has been made. By numerous decisions of this court it has been held that a ease-made, or transcript of the record, unless accompanied by a petition in error will not present any question for the court to determine.

Roberts v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 312, 136 Pac. 201; Edwards v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 715, 103 Pac. 1072; Baker v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 716. 103 Pac. 1072.

There being no petition in error filed in this case, the motion to dismiss the purported appeal is sustained, and the cause remanded. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Prank Masoero was tried and convicted in the county court of Okmulgee county of the offense of failing, neglecting and refusing to work the road in road district No. 4, Henry township, after being duly notified to work the same, and attempted to appeal from the judgment of conviction by filing in this court on October 116th, 1914, a case-made, to which no petition in error was attached at the time it was filed, and none has been filed since. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the pretended appeal on the ground that no petition in error has even been filed in said ease. No answer or response to said motion has been made. By numerous decisions of this court it has been held that a ease-made, or transcript of the record, unless accompanied by a petition in error will not present any question for the court to determine.

Roberts v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 312, 136 Pac. 201; Edwards v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 715, 103 Pac. 1072; Baker v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 716. 103 Pac. 1072.

There being no petition in error filed in this case, the motion to dismiss the purported appeal is sustained, and the cause remanded. Mandate forthwith.

Masoero v. State, 1914 OK CR 200, 143 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 685, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 95 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK CR 200 (Masoero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related