Masoero v. State
This text of 1914 OK CR 200 (Masoero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prank Masoero was tried and convicted in the county court of Okmulgee county of the offense of failing, neglecting and refusing to work the road in road district No. 4, Henry township, after being duly notified to work the same, and attempted to appeal from the judgment of conviction by filing in this court on October 116th, 1914, a case-made, to which no petition in error was attached at the time it was filed, and none has been filed since. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the pretended appeal on the ground that no petition in error has even been filed in said ease. No answer or response to said motion has been made. By numerous decisions of this court it has been held that a ease-made, or transcript of the record, unless accompanied by a petition in error will not present any question for the court to determine.
Roberts v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 312, 136 Pac. 201; Edwards v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 715, 103 Pac. 1072; Baker v. State, 2 Okla. Cr. 716. 103 Pac. 1072.
There being no petition in error filed in this case, the motion to dismiss the purported appeal is sustained, and the cause remanded. Mandate forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1914 OK CR 200, 143 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 685, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masoero-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.