Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma/Baker v. State

Baker v. State

1909 OK CR 117, 103 P. 1072, 2 Okla. Crim. 716, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 25, 1909
DocketNo. 44.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1909 OK CR 117 (Baker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. State, 1909 OK CR 117, 103 P. 1072, 2 Okla. Crim. 716, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196 (Okla. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

FURMAN, Presiding Judge.

What purports to be the record in this case is not attached to a petition in error, and does not contain the information, the testimony of the witnesses, the instructions to the jury, or the judgment.of the court. It only contains the verdict of the jury and a motion to quash the information upon the gro-und that the enforcement act is unconstitu *717 tional. The pretended record sent np it not settled and signed by the trial judge, and no notices of appeal were served and .filed, as directed by law. Neither have any briefs been filed. Further comment is unnecessary.

The attempted appeal is dismissed.

DOYLE and O'WEN, Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Masoero v. State
1914 OK CR 200 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1909 OK CR 117, 103 P. 1072, 2 Okla. Crim. 716, 1909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-state-oklacrimapp-1909.