Maslowsky v. Cassidy

385 U.S. 11, 17 L. Ed. 2d 11, 87 S. Ct. 94, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 558

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1966·No. No. 574·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maslowsky v. Cassidy, 385 U.S. 11, 17 L. Ed. 2d 11, 87 S. Ct. 94, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 558 (1966).

Pincite

385 U.S. 11 (Maslowsky v. Cassidy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

929 F. Supp. 824 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)

859 F.2d 1538 (Seventh Circuit, 1988)

636 F. Supp. 828 (S.D. California, 1986)

465 N.E.2d 1001 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1984)

668 P.2d 513 (Utah Supreme Court, 1983)

354 A.2d 103 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)