Maslowsky v. Cassidy

385 U.S. 11, 17 L. Ed. 2d 11, 87 S. Ct. 94, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 558
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 10, 1966
DocketNo. 574
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 385 U.S. 11 (Maslowsky v. Cassidy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maslowsky v. Cassidy, 385 U.S. 11, 17 L. Ed. 2d 11, 87 S. Ct. 94, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 558 (1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Civil Liberties Union v. Reno
929 F. Supp. 824 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1996)
United States v. Dost
636 F. Supp. 828 (S.D. California, 1986)
KUTV, INC. v. Conder
668 P.2d 513 (Utah Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Seigel
354 A.2d 103 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 U.S. 11, 17 L. Ed. 2d 11, 87 S. Ct. 94, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maslowsky-v-cassidy-scotus-1966.