Maslia v. Hamilton

235 S.E.2d 485, 239 Ga. 52, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 814
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 5, 1977
Docket31865
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 235 S.E.2d 485 (Maslia v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maslia v. Hamilton, 235 S.E.2d 485, 239 Ga. 52, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 814 (Ga. 1977).

Opinion

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case and reverse. Hamilton v. Maslia, 140 Ga. App. 239 (230 SE2d 318) (1976). A motion to set aside a judgment filed during the same court term the judgment is entered may be acted upon at a subsequent term. Ammons v. Bolick, 233 Ga. 324 (210 SE2d 796) (1974). The failure to have a rule nisi issued during the judgment term extending a hearing into the next term does not alter this rule. Code Ann. § 81A-106 (c) provides, "The period of time provided for the doing of any act or the taking of any proceeding is not *53 affected or limited by the continued existence or expiration of a term of court, except as otherwise specifically provided by law. The continued existence or expiration of a term of court in no way affects the power of a court to do any act or take any proceeding in any civil action which has been pending before it, except as otherwise provided by law.” We find no requirement that a rule nisi be issued upon the motion here at the same term of court at which the judgment is entered. All that is required is not less than five days notice of the hearing thereon. Code Ann. § 81A-106 (d); Stoner v. McDougall, 235 Ga. 171 (219 SE2d 138) (1975).

Argued March 14, 1977 Decided April 5, 1977 Rehearing denied April 21 and May 25, 1977. Worozbyt & Nodvin, Marvin P. Nodvin, for appellants. William R. Parker, for appellee.

Division 2 of the Court of Appeals is reversed; Divisions 3 and 4 and the judgment are vacated. The case is thus remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion and for further determination of the nature of the motion at issue in this case. See Pekor v. Clark, 236 Ga. 457 (224 SE2d 30) (1976).

Judgment reversed, vacated and remanded.

Nichols, C. J., Jordan, Ingram, Hall and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Granite Loan Solutions, LLC v. Clarence King
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015
Granite Loan Solutions, LLC v. King
779 S.E.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
Griffin v. Rutland
578 S.E.2d 540 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
Pagan Martinez v. Lozano Lopez
2 T.C.A. 540 (Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico, 1996)
Young Construction, Inc. v. Old Hickory House 3, Inc.
436 S.E.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Pierce v. Gaskins
309 S.E.2d 658 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Hamilton v. Maslia
241 S.E.2d 32 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 S.E.2d 485, 239 Ga. 52, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maslia-v-hamilton-ga-1977.