Mask v. Rawls

57 Miss. 270
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 57 Miss. 270 (Mask v. Rawls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mask v. Rawls, 57 Miss. 270 (Mich. 1879).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The exclusion of the affidavit which was the commencement of the prosecution complained of as malicious was erroneous. The gravamen of the action is the malicious prosecution of the plaintiff, upon a false and unfounded charge, whereby damage was done to him. It matters not that the affidavit does not contain a charge of felony or other crime. It served as the basis of a warrant for the arrest of the party charged, and the sting of malice and falsehood is just as hurtful when inflicted through the medium of an affidavit legally insufficient, as if it was drawn with technical precision. It is settled by respectable authorities that case, as contradis-tinguished from trespass vi et armis, is maintainable in such [273]*273case, and this view fully comports with our system of remedies. Hays v. Younglove, 7 B. Mon. 545; Morris v. Scott, 21 Wend. 281; Stone v. Stevens, 12 Conn. 219.

Judgment reversed and new trial a,warded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuhnhausen v. Stadelman
149 P.2d 108 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
State Life Ins. Co. of Ind. v. Hardy
195 So. 708 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1940)
Vander Linden v. Oster
156 N.W. 911 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
McIntosh v. Wales
134 P. 274 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Miss. 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mask-v-rawls-miss-1879.