Masden v. Nevada
This text of 36 F. App'x 609 (Masden v. Nevada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Daniel Masden appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion for relief from the judgment dismissing his action with prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of our recent decision Community Dental Services v. Tani, 282 F.3d 1164 (9th Cir.2002).
Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. App'x 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masden-v-nevada-ca9-2002.