Marzolf v. United States
45 Cust. Ct. 244
United States Customs Court·Decided August 22, 1960·No. No. 64464; protests 248158-K, etc. (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of fresh, chilled, or frozen pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 59714, and the items marked “B” consist of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marzolf v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 244 (cusc 1960).
45 Cust. Ct. 244 (Marzolf v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tower v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 36 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)