Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer

131 S.W.2d 1119
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 6, 1939
DocketNo. 3517
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 S.W.2d 1119 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer, 131 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

O’QUINN,- Justice.

This is an appeal from the County Court of Nacogdoches County. From an inspection of the record, we have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed. On the authority of Associated Indemnity Corp. et al. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Martinez v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Southwest Pump Co. v. C. F. Winfield, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Parker v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Quality Tire Co. v. Chaddick, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Sagarin v. Holliday, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040, without written opinion. the affirmance is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan
149 S.W.2d 1008 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.W.2d 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maryland-casualty-co-v-palmer-texapp-1939.