Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer

131 S.W.2d 1119
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 6, 1939·No. No. 3517·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

O’QUINN,- Justice.

This is an appeal from the County Court of Nacogdoches County. From an inspection of the record, we have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed. On the authority of Associated Indemnity Corp. et al. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Martinez v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Southwest Pump Co. v. C. F. Winfield, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Parker v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Quality Tire Co. v. Chaddick, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Sagarin v. Holliday, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040, without written opinion. the affirmance is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer, 131 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

131 S.W.2d 1119 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan
149 S.W.2d 1008 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)