Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer
Opinion
This is an appeal from the County Court of Nacogdoches County. From an inspection of the record, we have concluded that the judgment must be affirmed. On the authority of Associated Indemnity Corp. et al. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Martinez v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Southwest Pump Co. v. C. F. Winfield, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Parker v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Quality Tire Co. v. Chaddick, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Sagarin v. Holliday, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040, without written opinion. the affirmance is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
131 S.W.2d 1119 (Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.