Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan

149 S.W.2d 1008, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 215

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 27, 1941

DocketNo. 3838.

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.W.2d 1008 (Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan, 149 S.W.2d 1008, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 215 (Tex. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

O’QUINN, Justice.

This case originated in justice court. The judgment in that court was appealed to the County Court of Jefferson County, at Law, where judgment in the sum of $75 was for appellee. This appeal is from that judgment. From an inspection of the record we have concluded the judgment should be affirmed. On the authority of Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Martinez v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Southwest Pump Co. v. C. F. Winfield, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Parker v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Quality Tire Co. v. Chaddick, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Sagarin v. Holliday, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Maryland Cas. Co. v. Palmer, Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 1119, the affirmance is without written opinion. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’QUINN, Justice.

This case originated in justice court. The judgment in that court was appealed to the County Court of Jefferson County, at Law, where judgment in the sum of $75 was for appellee. This appeal is from that judgment. From an inspection of the record we have concluded the judgment should be affirmed. On the authority of Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Martinez v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Southwest Pump Co. v. C. F. Winfield, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Parker v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Quality Tire Co. v. Chaddick, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Sagarin v. Holliday, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Maryland Cas. Co. v. Palmer, Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 1119, the affirmance is without written opinion. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.W.2d 1008, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-zummo-v-nw-nolan-texapp-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack