Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan

149 S.W.2d 1008, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 215
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 1941·No. No. 3838.·Published

Opinion

O’QUINN, Justice.

This case originated in justice court. The judgment in that court was appealed to the County Court of Jefferson County, at Law, where judgment in the sum of $75 was for appellee. This appeal is from that judgment. From an inspection of the record we have concluded the judgment should be affirmed. On the authority of Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Martinez v. Martinez, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Southwest Pump Co. v. C. F. Winfield, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Parker v. Miller, Tex.Civ.App., 125 S.W.2d 1119; Quality Tire Co. v. Chaddick, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Sagarin v. Holliday, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040; Maryland Cas. Co. v. Palmer, Tex.Civ.App., 131 S.W.2d 1119, the affirmance is without written opinion. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan, 149 S.W.2d 1008, 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 215 (Tex. Ct. App. 1941).

149 S.W.2d 1008 (Frank Zummo v. N.W. Nolan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sagarin v. A. F. Holliday
127 S.W.2d 1040 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
O. B. Martinez v. Manuela Esparza
125 S.W.2d 1119 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
O. L. Parker v. W. A. Miller
125 S.W.2d 1119 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
S.W. Pump v. C. F. Winfield
125 S.W.2d 1119 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Quality Tire Co. v. Chaddick
127 S.W.2d 1040 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Gatling
75 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Palmer
131 S.W.2d 1119 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)